| + -
Wednesday, 07 December 2011 03:42

In the world’s least developed countries, 120 of every 1,000 children die before turning five, a mortality rate 20 times that of high-income countries.1 Although the differences between high- and low-income countries are striking, this inequity in child mortality exists within countries as well. For example, across all regions of Indonesia, under-5 mortality is almost four times higher in the poorest fifth of the population compared to the wealthiest fifth.1 National health insurance schemes aim to reduce these disparities.

Yet despite the universal goals of national health insurance schemes, the poorest of the poor can be the last enrolled in such schemes, resulting in unequal access to health care services.2, 4, 5 Health voucher programs strive to improve equity by providing financial access to the most disenfranchised populations and filling the gaps in established social protection schemes. In this article, we examine how health voucher programs can address challenges in ensuring equity and discuss the strengths and weaknesses in a current voucher program in Kenya that is providing poor women with access to safe motherhood and family planning services.

Health Care Equity

The keystone of health care equity is equal access to care, meaning that health care provision shouldn’t depend on factors such as socioeconomic status, gender, or ethnicity. To meet that goal, programs that promote health care equity attempt to:

1.    target marginalized populations,

2.    treat patients with dignity and respect, and

3.    deliver appropriate, high quality services.

In Kenya, the Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation (MoPHS) and the Ministry of Medical Services (MoMS; formerly the Ministry of Health) manage publicly funded health care, allocating almost $350 million USD for inputs per year.3 Traditional global budgeting approaches fund health care systems with direct payments for inputs, like physical infrastructure, human resources, and pharmaceuticals. Results-based approaches, on the other hand, pay providers for services provided.

Financing schemes like social health insurance can address issues with proper treatment and service quality, but some gaps persist. For example, social health insurance schemes cannot guarantee easy access for those who do not have transportation, lack knowledge of how to utilize available services, or face cultural barriers to accessing care. The result is that the poorest are often the last to benefit from social health insurance.4, 5 Vouchers are priced for and marketed to poor people in urban slums and rural areas. Thus vouchers can successfully reach the neediest patients who might otherwise slip through the cracks of the broader insurance scheme.

Increasing Equity for Kenyan Women

In 2006 the Kenyan government began the Reproductive Health Vouchers program with the ultimate goal of reducing maternal and infant mortality by improving access to health services for the poor. Women qualify for vouchers based on a poverty-grading tool. Eligible women can then purchase vouchers for services such as maternity care, family planning, and gender-based violence counseling (no fee). Vouchers cost 100-200 Kenyan shillings (approximately $1-2 USD). Facilities submit claims and are reimbursed per service.

The Population Council baseline evaluation7 found that between 2006 and 2010, vouchers appeared to increase socio-economic equity between poor and non-poor women in family planning and maternity care service delivery, compared to similar populations without the voucher service. In addition, some service providers stated that the program significantly led to improvements in both service quality and physical infrastructure. A service provider in Kitui reported, “Because of that reimbursement, we are doing very well… we were able to build that... that building there.... We have constructed a maternity... and have done a lot of renovations… so to us it’s a benefit.”

Voucher patients were satisfied with services provided as well, especially in public health facilities: 92% of voucher clients reported being satisfied with the services they received compared to 85% of non-voucher clients at non-contracted facilities.7

Service utilization, which is instrumental to improving health outcomes, also increased with vouchers. Significantly more voucher clients than non-voucher clients used reproductive health services such as long-term family planning methods, skilled delivery and post-natal care services.7

A voucher client in Kitui provided a clear explanation of how vouchers increase equity: “There are changes because most of us never used to go to clinic. We would get pregnant and stay at home. When you’re told to go to hospital you would say, I don’t have money, I don’t have money. But now you won’t find anyone staying at home.”

REFERENCES

1. CG Victora, A Wagstaff, JA Schellenberg, D Gwatkin, M Claeson, and JP Habicht, Applying an equity lens to child health and mortality: more of the same is not enough. Lancet,  362 (2003), pp. 233-241.

2. DR Gwatikin and A Ergo, Comment: Universal health coverage: friend or foe of health equity? Lancet, 377 (2011), pp. 2160 -2161

3. Kenya Ministry of State for Planning, National Development and Vision 2030: Public Expenditure Review. (2010), pp. 75-99.

4. T Ensor and S Cooper, Overcoming Barriers to Health Service Access and Influencing the Demand Side through Purchasing. Health, Nutrition and Population Discussion Paper (2004), The World Bank.

5. A Acharya, S Vellakkal, S Kalita, et al. Do social health insurance schemes in developing country settings improve health outcomes and reduce the impoverishing effect of healthcare payments for the poorest people? Systematic review (2010), DfID.

6. J Larsen and A Van Middelkoop, The “unbooked” mother at King Edward VIII Hospital, Durban. South African Med J, 62 (1982), pp. 483–486.

7. The Reproductive Health Vouchers Program in Kenya: Summary of Findings from Program Evaluation. Reproductive Health Vouchers Evaluation Team (2011), Nairobi: Population Council, September 20, 2011.

 
Saturday, 22 October 2011 00:05

The Population Council office in Nairobi is seeking qualified applicants for a data manager position related to the evaluation of integrated SRH/HIV services and of reproductive health voucher programs. A brief position description and a link to the full job announcement are given below.

Data Manager:

The position will provide technical support for managing data (including in-depth analysis) for two large reproductive health projects in Kenya and Swaziland: The INTEGRA project is measuring the benefits and costs of integrated SRH and HIV services in two provinces in Kenya and in Swaziland. The RH Vouchers Project is evaluating the impact of integrated HIV and RH services in Kenya and four other countries.  In addition to supporting the evaluation of the two major projects, a good understanding of M & E frameworks and management experience with spatial and survey data is essential.

View the full job announcement for Data Manager (Word document)


 
Wednesday, 25 May 2011 10:21

The 2010 Kenya Service Provision Assessment Survey was released in Nairobi on Tuesday, May 24 with crucial maternal healthcare service delivery statistics worth highlighting. But of particular note is the existing disparities between the rural and urban women in the link to maternal healthcare facilities. In this feature article, the author traces the journey of Purity Njambi, a 27-year old mother who delivered her twins last week through caesarian section at Pumwani Maternity Hospital, the largest public facility referral institution in East Africa, in a bid to highlight the critical role of access to comprehensive emergency obstetric care in saving lives as earlier highlighted in this blog. The article paints a grave picture of the disparities that exist between Purity and her rural counterparts, including the fact that only a half of the total health facilities sampled in the survey have a system to transfer maternal emergencies to an appropriate facility.

Download article

 
Tuesday, 03 May 2011 00:00

A pool of reproductive health (RH) voucher program and technical experts from Bangladesh, Cambodia, Kenya and Uganda met in Nairobi, Kenya for a four-day workshop, from April 26th to 29th, to discuss a range of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) issues affecting voucher program design and implementation. The meeting, hosted by Population Council focused on the role of management information systems in voucher programs management and zeroed in on critical gaps and links that that can be optimized for better program reporting and performance.alt

Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) activities are critical in measuring the overall impact and cost-effectiveness of voucher programs. Besides providing the basis for decision making, M&E also acts as a means to assess the overall voucher programs performance and cost-effectiveness. In most voucher pilot programs however, the monitoring process has been hampered by weak management information systems both in terms of structure and efficiency.

On the first day of the discussions, participants had the opportunity to share country experiences with a deeper dive into data collection and management processes. There was a cross-cutting observation that most programs are overly reliant on the implementing agency information collection and data management structures that need better alignment with the public sector in order to contribute to stronger M&E frameworks at the policy level. Besides the external evaluation, most voucher programs are yet to establish internal M&E frameworks that can help assess their impact and cost-effectiveness.

Country representatives also presented best practice examples that could be borrowed by other platforms including Cambodia's nationally-linked information database system that centrally monitors voucher distribution, claim processing and reimbursement processes. Bangladesh and Cambodia programs also have a proactive incentive system that reimburses voucher promoters for institutional deliveries realized in addition to the sales-based tokens. At the end of the workshop, each country program enumerated their MIS need and the specific indicators relevant in developing effective monitoring and evaluation tools to better improve their reporting systems and operational efficiency. The diversity in the voucher program management models also featured with no particular advantage of the public-sector managed structure in Bangladesh over the private sector one in Uganda or the mix of both public & private sector facilities in Kenya.

Population Council through funding from Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is conducting a multi-country evaluation study in the four countries participating in the workshop. Other participants include representatives from PriceWaterhouseCoopers, the voucher management agency for Kenya and Cambodia programs, TMG Kenya and Gobee Group who are the MIS evaluation consultants for the voucher programs in East Africa and south east Asia respectively. The Kenyan Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation was represented by the Project Management Unit, that will take over the voucher program implementing role from the National Coordinating Agency for Population and Development (NCAPD).

 
Thursday, 14 April 2011 17:09

The Population Council’s Reproductive Health Voucher Program evaluation study protocols for Kenya and Bangladesh have been published in the latest issue of Biomedical Central (BMC) Public Health Journal. The Kenyan and Bangladesh protocols outline a detailed approach to each country's quasi-experimental study that is currently investigating the impact of the voucher approach on improving reproductive health behaviors, status and reducing inequities at the population  and facility levels. With funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Council embarked on a multi-country evaluation study to generate evidence around the ‘voucher and accreditation’ approaches to improving the reproductive health of low income women in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Bangladesh and Cambodia. The study also intends to assess the effect of vouchers on increasing access to, and quality of, and reducing inequities in the use of selected reproductive health services. The design includes health facility assessments, facility inventories, structured client provider-interaction observations and client exit interviews.

The study comprises of four populations; facilities, providers, women of reproductive health age using facilities and women and men who have been pregnant and/ or used family planning within the previous 12 months. It combines samples of public, private and faith-based facilities from three districts; Kisumu, Kiambu, Kitui and two informal settlements in Nairobi, all of which have been accredited to provide maternal and newborn health and family planning services to women with vouchers in comparison to a matched sample of non-accredited facilities. About 3000 respondents will participate in a survey to be carried out in both vouchers and non-voucher distribution areas.

Download the Kenya evaluation study protocol in PDF

Download the Bangladesh evaluation study protocol in PDF

 

Page 1 of 14

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Latest News from Twitter

RHVouchers: RT @gatesfoundation #Technology to predict life saving potential of newborns & mothers http://t.co/HptFh94p #maternalhealth #FHchat

1HOUR via web

Archives

Powered by mod LCA